In Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc., the Supreme Court upholds residential picketing and creates a useful test for abortion clinic picketing.

In Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia, the Supreme Court stops discrimination and orders equal access for a Christian university student newspaper denied funding that was provided to other groups.

In Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston, the Supreme Court unanimously establishes a national precedent in upholding the right of private organizations to freely associate or not associate with other groups.

In American Library Association v. Reno, the Supreme Court denied review of this case, letting stand the labeling and record-keeping provisions of the Child Protection Act.

In United States v. Virginia Military Institute, the Supreme Court rejects the Clinton Justice Department's request to increase the test for "gender discrimination" to "strict scrutiny" - the highest level of review for discrimination, as used in race cases.

In Alliance for Community Media v. FCC, the Supreme Court upholds the portion of the cable law that permits cable companies to refuse to televise pornographic shows.

In Washington v. Glucksberg and Vacco v. Quill, the Supreme Court unanimously rules that the U.S. Constitution does not provide a “right” to assisted suicide.

In Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network, relying on precedent in the first ADF-backed victory at the Supreme Court, Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc., the Supreme Court struck down the 15-foot "floating bubble zone" wherein religious speech is prohibited by the state.

In Mazurek v. Armstrong, the Supreme Court determines that Montana's "physician only" statute is constitutional, blocking the flood of abortions that would have followed had the court decided to strike down the law.

In Lambert v. Wicklund, the Supreme Court vacated the lower court decision, thereby upholding Montana's parental notification law that has proven to effectively reduce abortions.

In Agostini v. Felton, the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for public school programs to provide remedial education to disadvantaged private school students who attend faith-based schools.

In National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) v. Finley, the Supreme Court rules 8–1 that the tax-funded NEA can refuse to give taxpayer dollars to pornographic and anti-Christian art.

In Troxel v. Granville, the Supreme Court affirms the rights of parents over the rights of the government in child rearing.

In Mitchell v. Helms, the Supreme Court holds that government funding of educational materials and equipment for religious schools can be constitutional.

In Dale v. Boy Scouts of America, following the precedent established in the 1995 ADF-backed case of Hurley v. Irish–American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston, the Supreme Court decided that the Boy Scouts is a private organization and can exclude advocates of homosexual behavior from its leadership.

In City of Erie v. Pap's A.M. dba "Kandyland", six Supreme Court justices reverse the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision, which had struck down the City of Erie's ordinance barring public nudity based on an erroneous view of the First Amendment.

In Good News Club v. Milford Central Schools, the Supreme Court sides with ADF-funded allied lawyers and decides that middle schools do not violate the U.S. Constitution when they allow Bible clubs to meet after hours.

In Adler v. Duval County School Board, the Supreme Court declines to review an appeal by the Duval County School Board of an ADF victory that upheld the right of students to speak about their faith and to pray at graduation ceremonies.

In City News & Novelty v. Waukesha, WI, the Supreme Court dismissed pornographers' petition for review in a case challenging Waukesha’s licensing ordinance which the city used to deny renewal of pornographers’ licenses.

In Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the Supreme Court upholds the Ohio school voucher program, allowing parents to remove their children from underperforming public schools and use government vouchers for private or religious schools.

In City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, the Supreme Court upholds the right of communities to regulate pornographic businesses.

In United States v. American Library Association, the Supreme Court rules that Congress's mandate that publicly funded libraries provide internet filtering devices in order to protect children is constitutional.

In Scheidler v. National Organization for Women (NOW), the Supreme Court rules that peaceful pro-life activists are not in violation of the federal laws intended to stop organized crime.

In Lewis v. Alfaro, the California Supreme Court unanimously rules that San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom acted illegally when he directed the city and county clerk to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

In City of Littleton (CO) v. Z.J. Gifts, the Supreme Court unanimously rules that communities can defend themselves against the spread of sexually oriented businesses and the resulting social consequences.

In Van Orden v. Perry, the Supreme Court upholds a Ten Commandments display on the grounds of the Texas Capitol complex, ruling that the Texas display did not violate the Establishment Clause.

In National Organization for Women (NOW) v. Scheidler (this case was originally decided by the Supreme Court in 2003), the Supreme Court once again issues a favorable decision, ruling unanimously that peaceful pro-life activists are not in violation of the federal laws intended to stop organized crime.

In Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, the Supreme Court rules unanimously that the Solomon Act is constitutional, and Congress may require law schools - even those who have a non-discrimination clause that is counter to the military's view on open homosexual behavior - to provide equal access to military recruiters without violating the school's freedoms of speech and association.

In Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal, the Supreme Court unanimously decides, under the Religious Freedom Resotration Act, that when the practice of a sincerely held religious belief conflicts with federal regulations, the federal government must show the regulation is the least restrictive means to advance a compelling government interest before the religious practice can be limited. The decision provides a legal framework that could pave the way for returning to the Constitution’s original intent with regard to religious liberties cases.

In Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, the Supreme Court unanimously vacates a lower court ruling striking down New Hampshire's "Parental Notification Prior to Abortion Act" and returns the case to lower courts for reconsideration.

In Sanchex-Llamas v. Oregon, and Bustillo v. Johnson, the Supreme Court upholds the sovereignty of U.S. law over the decisions of foreign courts when ruling that a treaty does not give foreign defendants special status in U.S. Courts. This is an important victory in the legal battle to curb the use of international law to supersede the U.S. Constitution.

In Hein v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, the Supreme Court rules that an atheist organization lacks taxpayer standing to challenge the funding of a White House conference that informed both faith-based and secular organizations about federal funding for programs that help the poor.

ADF wins a total of five cases protecting marriage and the family within the month of May. Three of these victories uphold constitutional marriage amendments in the states of Michigan, Oregon, and Wisconsin; one affirms parental rights in Maryland; and one protects citizens in Michigan from exposure to sexually oriented businesses.

In FCC v. Fox News, the Supreme Court finds that the FCC's regulation of vulgarity during public broadcasts was intended to protect children from indecent language, and that the FCC has the right to impose a fine on broadcasters when a live broadcast includes a "fleeting expletive" during prime time.

In Pleasant Grove City v. Summum, the Supreme Court rules that a Ten Commandments monument is government speech and that the city of Pleasant Grove cannot be forced to accept a donated monument from a new age religious group that sued the city for unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination.

In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court rules that election law cannot be manipulated to silence speech on religious freedom, the sanctity of life, marriage, and the family.

In Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the ACLU’s clients – so-called “offended” taxpayers – did not have any legal “standing” to challenge a state tuition tax credit program that allows parents to make the best educational choice for their children – including Christian schools – through private school tuition organizations.