The Alliance Defense Fund is a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth, through strategy, training, funding, and litigation. ADF is focused on three key issues: Religious Freedom, Sanctity of Human Life, and Traditional Family Values.
AboutIssuesWhat We DoActionsGet Involved
ADF - Defending Our First Liberty.
Involved Image
  All News

  In Your Community

  Press Releases

  Briefings

  Alliance Alert

  Advanced Search

Skip Navigation LinksHome > ADF News Center > News Story 


Court awards ADF right to intervene on behalf of abstinence-only sex education program

ADF attorneys moving forward on behalf of Silver Ring Thing in ACLU of Massachusetts v. Leavitt
Tuesday, August 23, 2005, 3:10 PM (MST) |
ADF Media Relations | 480-444-0020


"Time and time again, the effectiveness of abstinence-only education programs has been proven," said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Joel Oster.  "The ACLU's continuing crusade to undermine programs which encourage teenagers to remain abstinent shows again their ethical shortcomings and an agenda which is beneficial to no one."

BOSTON - A federal court has granted attorneys with the Alliance Defense Fund the right to intervene on behalf of Silver Ring Thing, an abstinence-based sex education program in danger of losing federal funding because of an ACLU lawsuit.

"ADF chose to represent SRT because the program offers kids the truth about the only certain way to avoid the destructive effects of premarital sex:  abstinence," said ADF Senior Legal Counsel Joel Oster.  "We are continuing our fight to show SRT has not run afoul of the law and in fact never utilized funding for religious indoctrination or teaching, as the ACLU claims."

SRT's program encourages teenagers to sign a pledge of abstinence until marriage and to wear a silver ring as a reminder of their vow.

The ACLU of Massachusetts filed its lawsuit, ACLU of Massachusetts v. Leavitt, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts last month against federal officials in charge of funding sex education programs.  The ACLU claims that funding provided by the federal government to SRT constitutes an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.

According to the motion to intervene, SRT has a direct interest in the outcome of the case since the ACLU is challenging SRT's constitutional right to participate in government funding programs free from religious discrimination.

"Time and time again, the effectiveness of abstinence-only education programs has been proven," Oster said. "The ACLU's continuing crusade to undermine programs which encourage teenagers to remain abstinent shows again their ethical shortcomings and an agenda which is beneficial to no one."

Oster clarified the facts about the recent decision of the Department of Health and Human Services with regard to funding for SRT:  "HHS has asked SRT to clarify its guidelines to make sure that money is not spent inappropriately, but made no finding that money was spent inappropriately.  HHS simply wants assurance that all guidelines will be met.  SRT is working toward that end, as it always has."

ADF-allied attorneys Robert Kilroy and Mirick O'Connell of Westborough are local counsel in the case.

ADF is America's largest legal alliance defending religious liberty through strategy, training, funding, and litigation.

www.telladf.org


Back To Top 

Email to a Friend 

Printer Friendly Version 

About Issues What We Do Actions Get Involved
Purpose Sanctity of Life Training Current Actions Prayer
History Family Values Funding Victories Email Updates
Team Religious Freedom Strategy Emerging Issues Tell a Friend
Allies   Litigation   Donate
Testimonials       Multimedia
Careers       Take Action
        Order Products
        Gift Planning
© 2009 Alliance Defense Fund. All Rights Reserved.
Contact Us | Resources | Site Map | Privacy | Terms | RSS