The Alliance Defense Fund is a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth, through strategy, training, funding, and litigation. ADF is focused on three key issues: Religious Freedom, Sanctity of Human Life, and Traditional Family Values.
AboutIssuesWhat We DoActionsGet Involved
ADF - Defending Our First Liberty.
Involved Image
  All News

  In Your Community

  Press Releases

  Briefings

  Alliance Alert

  Advanced Search

Skip Navigation LinksHome > ADF News Center > News Story 


Marriage protected in Michigan, appeals court voids “domestic partner” benefits

Court rules marriage amendment prohibits public institutions from distributing marriage benefits to unmarried couples; ADF attorneys filed amicus brief
Friday, February 02, 2007, 2:10 PM (MST) |
ADF Media Relations | 480-444-0020


KALAMAZOO, Mich. — The Michigan Court of Appeals ruled Thursday that the state’s constitutional amendment protecting marriage as a union between one man and one woman prohibits public institutions from extending marriage benefits to unmarried couples, including same-sex “domestic partners.”

“All government programs should comply with state law, and the appeals court has correctly interpreted the state laws on marriage,” said ADF attorney Dale Schowengerdt, who authored a friend-of-the-court brief on the case along with ADF-allied attorney James Wierenga.  “Michigan law expressly prohibits marriage substitutes.  As the court recognized, government entities are free to give health and other benefits to employees, as long as it’s on an equal basis, without basing them on a marriage-like status.”

Receive Updates on Similar Stories
The brief, filed in January 2006, defended the state’s constitutional amendment protecting marriage as a union between one man and one woman, as well as the benefits secured therein (www.telladf.org/news/story.aspx?cid=3657).  The ACLU sued the state demanding marriage benefits for “domestic partnerships,” including same-sex couples.

Michigan’s marriage protection amendment, passed by the citizens of that state in November 2004, reads, “To secure and preserve the benefits of marriage for our society and for future generations of children, the union of one man and one woman in marriage shall be the only agreement recognized as a marriage or similar union for any purpose” (www.domawatch.com/stateissues/michigan/index.html).

“The people of Michigan made their intentions clear by passing a constitutional amendment that protects marriage from all counterfeits,” said Schowengerdt.  “Contrary to the demands of the ACLU, the marriage amendment clearly states what marriage is and what it is not.”

A copy of Thursday’s ruling by the Michigan Court of Appeals in the case National Pride at Work v. Governor of Michigan can be read at www.telladf.org/UserDocs/GovMIopinion.pdf.

For more information on the battle to protect marriage, visit www.domawatch.org.

ADF is a legal alliance defending the right to hear and speak the Truth through strategy, training, funding, and litigation.

www.telladf.org              www.domawatch.org



Back To Top 

Email to a Friend 

Printer Friendly Version 

About Issues What We Do Actions Get Involved
Purpose Sanctity of Life Training Current Actions Prayer
History Family Values Funding Victories Email Updates
Team Religious Freedom Strategy Emerging Issues Tell a Friend
Allies   Litigation   Donate
Testimonials       Multimedia
Careers       Take Action
        Order Products
        Gift Planning
© 2010 Alliance Defense Fund. All Rights Reserved.
Contact Us | Resources | Site Map | Privacy | Terms | RSS